The Man Who Lied to His Laptop: What Machines Teach Us About Human Relationships – Book Review

It’s been said so many times that it’s by now become a staid cliché: humans are social animals. We are adapted to social interaction, and to a large extend depend on our ability to interact and cooperate with others. Considering how important our social interactions are for our survival, it is surprising how little room it’s allocated in the regular school curriculum to learning more about what science has to teach us on this topic. Social Psychology, the branch of Psychology that deals with this subject, is in my opinion the most important of all social sciences, and perhaps the most practically relevant branch of science overall when it comes to usefulness for our daily lives. “The Man Who Lied to His Computer” is an excellent primer of that field, and overall a surprisingly useful and relevant popular science book.

The title of this book seems to evoke Oliver Sacks’ writings, and “The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat” in particular. Sacks, a well-known British neurologist and writer, has dedicated his life to exploring the hidden secrets of the way that our minds work by examining peculiar pathologies of the brain. Nass and Yen, on the other hand, have written a book based on the series of experiments performed at the Nass’ Stanford laboratory. These experiments tried to elucidate the way we interact with each other by looking at our interactions with computers. After spending many years on improving computer interfaces and the humanizing our interaction with computers, Nass had stumbled onto a brilliant idea of reversing the direction of his research, and started looking into improving the ways that we interact with each other based on the ways that we treat computers. It turns out that we really do anthropomorphize computers, and it is legitimate to extrapolate from the human-computer interactions to the interhuman ones.

The findings that this book focuses on are truly fascinating. I don’t want to reveal too much, but the one that I liked the most has to do with the optimal way of giving evaluations. As an educator I have always dreaded the most this part of my job, and unfortunately there is no silver bullet that will make this any easier. However, there are ways of presenting the information to your employees or students in a way that will really make your criticism feel and be more constructive.

The book is very well written. No one will ever match the beautifully flowing literary prose of Oliver Sacks, but Nass and Yen manage to write a very intriguing and informative little book. I was literally unable to put it down. I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in these topics, as well as to anyone who wants to improve their interpersonal skills.

 

Bojan Tunguz

Bojan Tunguz was born in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which he and his family fled during the civil war for the neighboring Croatia. Over the past two decades he has studied, lived and worked in the United States. He is a theoretical physicist with degrees from Stanford and University of Illinois. Tunguz has taught physics at several prominent liberal arts colleges and has been writing about physics, science and technology for more than a decade. He also has a wide spectrum of interests, and reads and writes about current events, society, culture, religion and politics. Over the years he has reviewed many of the books that he has read, and posted his reviews on various online outlets. In 2011 he had become a top 10 reviewer on Amazon.com, where he continues to be very active. Aside from reading and writing, Tunguz enjoys traveling, digital photography, hiking, and fitness. He resides with his wife in Indiana. You can follow my review updates on the following pages as well: Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tunguzreview Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/tunguzreviews Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/104312842297641697463/posts

Visit Website

There are no comments yet, add one below.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*